Consensus of 7 reviews (6 scored) from 5 independent publishers. PC-Welt and Tech Advisor (both Foundry); TechRadar and Android Central (both Future plc) count as one voice. How this is calculated.
consensus 75
PC-Welt77
Trusted Reviews76
Tech Advisor76
SmartWorld74
Android Central74
TechRadar74
6570758085
Each dot is one review, adjusted for how that publication usually scores; the line is our consensus. The closer the dots sit to the line, the more the reviewers agree.
Battery life is strong, lasting about two days under moderate use. — Trusted Reviews, Tech Advisor, TechRadar, Android Central, PC-Welt
The design closely resembles the iPhone, which some reviewers find derivative. — Tech Advisor, TechRadar, PC-Welt
The price has risen noticeably over the predecessor, which weighs against the upgrades. — Trusted Reviews, TechRadar, SmartWorld, Phonandroid
Where they disagree
Reviewers split on cameras: SmartWorld and Tech Advisor praise the main and telephoto lenses, while TechRadar calls camera quality inconsistent and Phonandroid notes reflections and weak macro results. — SmartWorld, Tech Advisor, TechRadar, Phonandroid
Android Central highlights the Image to Video AI feature as a standout, while Tech Advisor and PC-Welt find the AI suite scattered and unhelpful. — Android Central, Tech Advisor, PC-Welt
Charging speed is praised by SmartWorld and Android Central as very fast, but Tech Advisor and PC-Welt say wired charging is slower than the Honor 400 Pro. — SmartWorld, Android Central, Tech Advisor, PC-Welt
Bottom line: Suits buyers who want flagship-level performance, long battery life and a flat, premium-feeling design at a lower cost than full flagships. The trade-offs are a steep price rise over the predecessor, limited upgrades, and a heavily iPhone-like design with cluttered software.
Summarised with AI from the 7 reviews below — each one is linked in full.
A capable, well-built phone with strong camera and battery life, though its design is derivative and AI software is cluttered. A great buy at a good discount.
Sleek, premium-feeling design
Strong 200MP main camera with good detail
Two-day battery life under moderate use
Bright, vivid 120Hz AMOLED display
Snapdragon 8 Elite performance handles demanding games
A strong upper-midrange/flagship-level refresh with excellent cameras, fast charging, a flat display and better battery, though the price rose noticeably.
Excellent cameras, especially the main and telephoto sensors
Very fast charging
Flat, human-sized design with IP69 rating
Strong Snapdragon 8 Elite performance with 512GB storage
Flat 120Hz AMOLED display with fine PWM dimming
Virtual proximity sensor causes screen issues during voice calls
Price increased noticeably over the previous model
A flagship-style mid-range phone with stylish design, capable triple cameras and strong battery life, held back by a steep price rise and modest upgrades over the standard model.
Stylish, premium redesigned chassis with flat edges
Powerful Snapdragon 8 Elite performance
Capable triple camera system with 3.5x telephoto
Strong all-day battery life
Strong water and dust resistance (IP68/IP69/IP69K)
Much more expensive than the predecessor
Not many upgrades over the standard 600
Surprising amount of bloatware
Low-light photos show smoothed-over AI faces
Fingerprint sensor mounted quite far down the screen
A flagship-like Honor phone at a more accessible price, with a standout Image to Video AI feature, strong battery life and fast charging. Ultrawide camera and price against rivals are…
Outstanding battery life with 7,000mAh capacity
Fast 80W wired charging, full in about an hour
Image to Video 2.0 AI feature is unique and impressive
Flagship-class hardware with Snapdragon 8 Elite
Comfortable 6.52-inch size for one-handed use
Ultrawide camera is weaker than the rest of the system
Could be expensive against competing phones
Image to Video limited to eight seconds and daily or monthly quotas
UK and EU pricing likely higher after import costs
Verdicts, pros and cons are short summaries in our words of each publisher's review; scores are as the publisher gave them. Specs are taken from the reviews' spec boxes — where they differ, we show the value most of them give; price is the US launch price of the base model. Read the originals for the full picture.
