Phones · Honor

Honor 400

Released May 2025 · Full specs on GSMArena · Updated Apr 22, 2026

79

≈ Some disagreement · spread ±6

Consensus of 7 reviews (6 scored) from 5 independent publishers. PC-Welt and Tech Advisor (both Foundry); TechRadar and Android Central (both Future plc) count as one voice. How this is calculated.

PC-Welt88
Tech Advisor88
Android Central79
Trusted Reviews76
SmartWorld74
TechRadar74
Each dot is one review, adjusted for how that publication usually scores; the line is our consensus. The closer the dots sit to the line, the more the reviewers agree.

Where the reviewers agree

Where they disagree

Bottom line: Suits buyers wanting a mid-range phone with a bright screen, strong main camera and long update support. Trade-offs are weaker gaming performance, no telephoto or wireless charging, and some downgrades from the Honor 200.

Summarised with AI from the 7 reviews below — each one is linked in full.

Compare the Honor 400

Photos from the reviews

Photos belong to the publications credited; each links to the full review.

display901 source
design801 source
value801 source

Key specs

Released
May 2025
Launch price (UK)
£400
Launch price (Europe)
€499
Form factor
Standard
OS
Android
Display
6.6″
Main camera
200 MP
Telephoto lens
No
Battery
5,300 mAh
Wired charging
66 W
Chipset
Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
Base storage
256 GB
Weight
184 g
Water resistance
IP65
Software updates
6 years
Sold in
UK, Europe · not in US

What the reviewers said

Phonandroid FR

No scoreApr 22, 2026

A well-balanced mid-range phone with a bright screen, solid stamina and decent photos, though it feels unexciting due to cost-cutting compared with the Honor 200.

  • Bright AMOLED 120Hz screen with improved peak brightness and good colour accuracy
  • Good battery life, exceeding 13 hours in PCMark
  • Stable performance with good thermal management
  • Good daytime photos from main camera and stabilised video
  • Six years of OS and security updates
  • Performance is only average and weaker value than rivals
  • Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 lacks ray tracing support
  • Only 8GB RAM, down from 12GB on Honor 200
  • Ultra-wide camera dark at night; digital zoom noisy
  • Mono-like audio lacks treble detail and bass presence
Read the full review at Phonandroid →

SmartWorld IT

8/10Jun 24, 2025

A well-balanced mid-range phone with a strong camera, bright display, long battery life and fast charging, at a fair price, backed by six years of updates.

  • Very bright 6.55-inch OLED display
  • Fast 66W wired charging
  • Strong 200MP main camera
  • Balanced design, light at 184 g
  • Six years of OS and security updates
  • No expandable memory
  • Virtual proximity sensor may cause issues during calls
  • Software has few new features
  • No wireless charging
  • Image-to-video feature may become paid
Read the full review at SmartWorld →

PC-Welt DE

4.5/5Jun 4, 2025

A solid mid-range phone with a premium look and feel, strong display, cameras and battery life, though gaming performance falls short.

  • Premium-looking design and solid build
  • Bright 120Hz OLED display with strong HDR
  • Main 200MP camera with good detail and Harcourt portrait mode
  • Excellent battery life
  • Six years of Android and security updates
  • Slower wired charging than predecessor
  • Weak gaming performance; needs lower graphics settings
  • Ultrawide camera is weak, same as Honor 200
  • No wireless charging
  • No dedicated telephoto lens
Read the full review at PC-Welt →

TechRadar UK

4/5Jun 3, 2025

An affordable phone with a gorgeous display, solid performance and lots of storage. Not worth upgrading from the Honor 200, though.

  • Gorgeous, very bright AMOLED display
  • Solid performance for the mid-range price
  • Generous storage for the price
  • Premium-looking design, IP65 rating
  • Strong 200MP main camera with good portrait mode
  • AI features are hit and miss
  • MagicOS still needs some work
  • Smaller display and no telephoto versus Honor 200
  • No wireless charging
  • Same Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 as predecessor
Read the full review at TechRadar →

Tech Advisor UK

4.5/5May 22, 2025

A solid mid-range all-rounder with a premium look, a strong 200MP camera, excellent battery life and a great screen, though gaming performance is limited.

  • Premium look and feel for the price
  • Strong 200MP main camera and portrait mode
  • Excellent battery life
  • Bright, high-quality 120Hz OLED display
  • Six years of OS and security updates
  • Slower charging than predecessor
  • Not the best for demanding gaming
  • Same Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chip as last year
  • No dedicated telephoto lens
Read the full review at Tech Advisor →

Android Central US

4.25/5May 22, 2025

A well-designed mid-ranger with a great camera, strong battery life and useful AI software, though it lacks a telephoto lens and trails rivals in performance. A better pick than the…

  • Stylish, compact design with comfortable in-hand feel
  • All-day battery life with fast 66W charging
  • Strong 200MP main camera, especially portraits
  • Good eye-protection display features, including 3840Hz PWM dimming
  • Six years of Android OS updates and useful AI software
  • No telephoto lens on standard model
  • No 4K60 video recording
  • Not available in the US
  • IP65 in UK variant, below IP67/IP68 rivals
  • Mid-range chipset lags rivals in benchmarks and demanding games
Read the full review at Android Central →

Trusted Reviews UK

4/5May 22, 2025

A mid-range phone with a standout bright display, solid cameras and six years of updates, held back mainly by MagicOS usability and no wireless charging.

  • One of the best displays at this price
  • 256GB storage as standard
  • Six years of software updates
  • Strong cameras with capable 200MP main sensor
  • Good outdoor visibility and brightness
  • Some downgrades compared to Honor 200
  • AI features still need work
  • No wireless charging
  • MagicOS less intuitive than rival Android overlays
  • Night mode struggles with streetlights
Read the full review at Trusted Reviews →

Verdicts, pros and cons are short summaries in our words of each publisher's review; scores are as the publisher gave them. Specs are taken from the reviews' spec boxes — where they differ, we show the value most of them give; price is the US launch price of the base model. Read the originals for the full picture.