Phones · Samsung

Samsung Galaxy A17

Released August 2025 · Full specs on GSMArena · Updated Apr 21, 2026

58

≈ Some disagreement · spread ±6

Consensus of 8 reviews (7 scored) from 6 independent publishers. PCMag and CNET (both Ziff Davis); PC-Welt and Tech Advisor (both Foundry) count as one voice. How this is calculated.

PCMag73
PC-Welt67
Tech Advisor65
Tom's Guide57
SmartWorld57
CNET50
Wired50
Each dot is one review, adjusted for how that publication usually scores; the line is our consensus. The closer the dots sit to the line, the more the reviewers agree.

Where the reviewers agree

Where they disagree

Bottom line: Suits buyers who want a large screen and six years of updates on a tight budget and can accept slow performance. Main trade-offs are the weak processor and 4GB RAM, modest cameras, and a mono speaker. Several reviewers suggest the predecessor Galaxy A16 5G or…

Summarised with AI from the 8 reviews below — each one is linked in full.

Compare the Samsung Galaxy A17

Photos from the reviews

Photos belong to the publications credited; each links to the full review.

Key specs

Released
August 2025
Launch price (USD)
$200
Launch price (UK)
£199
Launch price (Europe)
€229
Form factor
Standard
OS
Android
Display
6.7″
Main camera
50 MP
Telephoto lens
No
Battery
5,000 mAh
Wired charging
25 W
Chipset
Exynos 1330
Base storage
128 GB
Weight
192 g
Water resistance
IP54
Software updates
6 years
Sold in
US, UK, Europe

What the reviewers said

Tom's Guide US

3/5Apr 21, 2026

Budget phone with a premium-feeling design and long software support, but sluggish performance, poor battery life, dim screen and weak camera make it hard to recommend.

  • Premium-feeling plastic design with IP54 rating
  • Six years of software support
  • Very affordable $199 starting price
  • Triple camera system and 90Hz display
  • 25W wired charging
  • Exynos 1330 performance lags on basic tasks
  • Short battery life, about 7h52m in drain test
  • Very dim screen, 657 nits peak brightness
  • Camera struggles in low light, no telephoto
  • Video recording capped at 1080p
Read the full review at Tom's Guide →

PCMag US

4/5Editors' ChoiceFeb 19, 2026

A respectable entry-level Samsung phone with a good screen, solid battery life and six years of updates, though its processor and memory are unchanged from last year.

  • Large, crisp 6.7-inch AMOLED with 90Hz refresh
  • Battery lasts about 15 hours 45 minutes in video test
  • Six-year upgrade commitment
  • Optical image stabilization for video at this price
  • Good cameras for a sub-$200 phone
  • Exynos 1330 processor and 4GB RAM show no year-over-year gain
  • Wi-Fi 5 instead of newer Wi-Fi 6 or 7
  • Screen struggles with glare outdoors
  • Mono speaker lacks bass depth
  • Macro and ultra-wide cameras are soft
Read the full review at PCMag →

CNET US

6/10Feb 17, 2026

A affordable Samsung phone with a bright screen, good value and long update promise, but sluggish multitasking and modest cameras hold it back from enthusiastic recommendation.

  • Big, bright 90Hz 1080p display
  • Good photos for the price
  • Six years of software and security updates
  • Samsung Now bar and Smart View features
  • Fast 25W wired charging
  • Multitasking with navigation and music is rough
  • Sluggish performance on basic tasks
  • Only 4GB of memory
  • Selfies and zoom shots are mediocre
  • No headphone jack
Read the full review at CNET →

Wired US

5/10Feb 10, 2026

Affordable and long-supported, but sluggish performance and unreliable multitasking make it frustrating daily; a $300 phone or used flagship is better.

  • Long six-year software update promise
  • Bright, sharp 90Hz AMOLED display
  • Decent daytime main camera
  • Day-long battery life with 25W charging
  • Expandable storage via microSD
  • Frustratingly slow performance with 4GB RAM
  • Lag, app refreshes, and delayed notifications
  • Weak low-light camera performance
  • No headphone jack
  • Camera app sometimes fails to load photos
Read the full review at Wired →

Phonandroid FR

No scoreDec 1, 2025

A functional budget Samsung phone with good screen, battery and stable heat, but slow performance, 4GB RAM and little real innovation over its predecessors.

  • Very good screen with well-calibrated colours
  • Good battery life
  • Does not overheat
  • Glass-fibre back is sturdier than before
  • Long-term update promise and Dolby Atmos support
  • Exynos 1330 with 4GB RAM feels sluggish
  • Weak GPU performance in graphics benchmarks
  • Single mono speaker sounds thin
  • Video capped at 30fps, weak zoom and night footage
  • Recycled design and hardware from earlier models
Read the full review at Phonandroid →

PC-Welt DE

3.5/5Nov 25, 2025

A solid budget Samsung phone, but it is nearly identical to the A16 5G with few real innovations, so the predecessor is often the better buy.

  • Slim and light design for its class
  • Six years of software updates
  • Large 6.7-inch AMOLED display with 90Hz
  • Unchanged low price, 128GB model from 174.90 euros
  • OIS added to the main camera
  • Almost identical to the Galaxy A16 5G
  • Weak secondary cameras; zoom results poor
  • No eSIM support; Wi-Fi 5 only
  • Mono speaker only; IP54 rating
  • Display defaults to 60Hz; modest 25W charging
Read the full review at PC-Welt →

Tech Advisor UK

3.5/5Nov 5, 2025

A solid budget Android phone with long software support, but it is nearly identical to the A16 5G with little innovation. Check for discounts on the predecessor first.

  • Sleek, slightly thinner and lighter design
  • Long software support, six years of updates
  • Large, vibrant 6.7-inch 90Hz AMOLED display
  • Smooth, slick One UI 7 interface
  • Decent daytime photos from main camera
  • Almost identical to the Galaxy A16 5G
  • Lacklustre ultrawide and macro cameras
  • No eSIM support in UK model
  • Only IP54 protection; mono speaker
  • Frequent stutters; display defaults to 60Hz
Read the full review at Tech Advisor →

SmartWorld IT

7/10Sep 15, 2025

A budget Galaxy phone with a large good-looking display and long update promise, but weak performance, average cameras and a high launch price make it hard to recommend.

  • Large, bright Super AMOLED display with 90Hz refresh
  • Six years of OS and security updates
  • Decent main 50MP camera in good light
  • 25W charging is good for the price
  • Expandable storage and IP54 rating
  • Disappointing performance from Exynos 1330 chipset
  • Plastic build quality feels only acceptable
  • Two of three rear cameras are nearly useless
  • Mono speaker and no HDR or always-on display
  • Launch price of 329 euros too high for specs
Read the full review at SmartWorld →

Verdicts, pros and cons are short summaries in our words of each publisher's review; scores are as the publisher gave them. Specs are taken from the reviews' spec boxes — where they differ, we show the value most of them give; price is the US launch price of the base model. Read the originals for the full picture.